<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Faith Growth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://faithgrowth.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://faithgrowth.com</link>
	<description>Church Leadership in a Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:55:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tri-Synodical Theological Conference Wrap-Up by Meredith Gould, PhD</title>
		<link>http://faithgrowth.com/2012/tri-synodical-theological-conference-wrap-up/#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Gould, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithgrowth.com/?p=1204#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>What a trippy treat to see these pics!  Don&#039;t tell the other denominations, but Lutherans are a much more attractive group than . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a trippy treat to see these pics!  Don&#8217;t tell the other denominations, but Lutherans are a much more attractive group than . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bios by 2012 Tri- Synodical Theological Theological Conference Tweetup</title>
		<link>http://faithgrowth.com/bios/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>2012 Tri- Synodical Theological Theological Conference Tweetup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s285681997.onlinehome.us/#comment-980</guid>
		<description>[...] Bios [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bios [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bios by #UNCO11 &#124; Tribal Church</title>
		<link>http://faithgrowth.com/bios/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>#UNCO11 &#124; Tribal Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s285681997.onlinehome.us/#comment-784</guid>
		<description>[...] of the experience completely depends on who shows up (well… that and the mad logistic skills of Christopher Harris). Thanks to Ryan Kemp-Pappan and Brian Merritt’s interactive promotional genius and design as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the experience completely depends on who shows up (well… that and the mad logistic skills of Christopher Harris). Thanks to Ryan Kemp-Pappan and Brian Merritt’s interactive promotional genius and design as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communication in the Church of the Future by Meredith Gould, PhD</title>
		<link>http://faithgrowth.com/2011/communication-in-the-church-of-the-future/#comment-749</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Gould, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 20:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithgrowth.com/?p=937#comment-749</guid>
		<description>A propos of &quot;how we learn,&quot; I seem to be on a perpetual tear within both the healthcare and church communications &quot;space&quot; (shoot me for using that idiom) about how everyone ought to learn some learning theory. Gardner&#039;s work framed the convo and is still valuable.  Ought to be taught in seminary.

Re: scaring folks. Why not?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A propos of &#8220;how we learn,&#8221; I seem to be on a perpetual tear within both the healthcare and church communications &#8220;space&#8221; (shoot me for using that idiom) about how everyone ought to learn some learning theory. Gardner&#8217;s work framed the convo and is still valuable.  Ought to be taught in seminary.</p>
<p>Re: scaring folks. Why not?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communication in the Church of the Future by Christopher Harris</title>
		<link>http://faithgrowth.com/2011/communication-in-the-church-of-the-future/#comment-748</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 07:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithgrowth.com/?p=937#comment-748</guid>
		<description>I view this as the second major shift in communication at the meta level.  I would agree that their have been many smaller shifts (what I would label movements) throughout human history that affected human communication.  This conclusion is based mainly on the work of Richard A. Jensen in his Book, Thinking In Story: Preaching in a Post-Literate Age.

Your post over at Two Friars and A Fool partly inspired this post. We agree that we are in the, &quot;throes of a major cultural ... and social ... shift with great potential for re-imagining church.&quot; I intended this post to be the first of many in which I explore this shift and how it will impact what the church of the future will look like. What we understand Social Media to be today is just beginning of another &#039;movement&#039; in the shift in human communication that is redefining not only how we communicate, but how we learn.  (Did you see that?  I just teased a future post topic.) 

Anyways, I feel like I am starting to ramble.  I appreciate your insight especially as a sociologist, and I look forward to our continued dialogue on this subject.

As for 20 years, you called me out on that one! As I was writing this, I settled on 20 years as to not scare folks too much. My first instinct was 5 years - still a long time in the online world.

I like your 3:1 ratio. I am going to have to monitor my online and IRL interactions and see how the 3:1 ration plays out.

Thanks for your comments. I am glad the post led you to respond.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I view this as the second major shift in communication at the meta level.  I would agree that their have been many smaller shifts (what I would label movements) throughout human history that affected human communication.  This conclusion is based mainly on the work of Richard A. Jensen in his Book, Thinking In Story: Preaching in a Post-Literate Age.</p>
<p>Your post over at Two Friars and A Fool partly inspired this post. We agree that we are in the, &#8220;throes of a major cultural &#8230; and social &#8230; shift with great potential for re-imagining church.&#8221; I intended this post to be the first of many in which I explore this shift and how it will impact what the church of the future will look like. What we understand Social Media to be today is just beginning of another &#8216;movement&#8217; in the shift in human communication that is redefining not only how we communicate, but how we learn.  (Did you see that?  I just teased a future post topic.) </p>
<p>Anyways, I feel like I am starting to ramble.  I appreciate your insight especially as a sociologist, and I look forward to our continued dialogue on this subject.</p>
<p>As for 20 years, you called me out on that one! As I was writing this, I settled on 20 years as to not scare folks too much. My first instinct was 5 years &#8211; still a long time in the online world.</p>
<p>I like your 3:1 ratio. I am going to have to monitor my online and IRL interactions and see how the 3:1 ration plays out.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comments. I am glad the post led you to respond.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communication in the Church of the Future by Meredith Gould, PhD</title>
		<link>http://faithgrowth.com/2011/communication-in-the-church-of-the-future/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator>Meredith Gould, PhD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 17:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithgrowth.com/?p=937#comment-747</guid>
		<description>Not sure that &quot;only the second such shift in the history of humanity&quot; is entirely accurate but that&#039;s just me being...me.  I do agree that we&#039;re in the throes of a major cultural (values, beliefs) and social (group and institutional behavior) shift with great potential for re-imagining church.

As I&#039;ve recently written over at Two Friars &amp; a Fool, (&quot;Social Media: Gateway to the First Century&quot;)  I view social media as an opportunity to break down and through damaging denominationalism, nurture friendships, and generate Christ-centered community.  

In 20 years? More like one to three or five years at the most.  After tracking online behavior for a while, I&#039;ve come up with a 3:1 ratio for calculating time in the online world.  Three months IRL = one month in virtual community.  Would love to see folks starting to track this to see if this ratio does, in fact, hold true super-empirically.

On another note: thanks for contributing your wisdom and wit to #chsocm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure that &#8220;only the second such shift in the history of humanity&#8221; is entirely accurate but that&#8217;s just me being&#8230;me.  I do agree that we&#8217;re in the throes of a major cultural (values, beliefs) and social (group and institutional behavior) shift with great potential for re-imagining church.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve recently written over at Two Friars &amp; a Fool, (&#8220;Social Media: Gateway to the First Century&#8221;)  I view social media as an opportunity to break down and through damaging denominationalism, nurture friendships, and generate Christ-centered community.  </p>
<p>In 20 years? More like one to three or five years at the most.  After tracking online behavior for a while, I&#8217;ve come up with a 3:1 ratio for calculating time in the online world.  Three months IRL = one month in virtual community.  Would love to see folks starting to track this to see if this ratio does, in fact, hold true super-empirically.</p>
<p>On another note: thanks for contributing your wisdom and wit to #chsocm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communication in the Church of the Future by Social Media and Communication in the Future Church</title>
		<link>http://faithgrowth.com/2011/communication-in-the-church-of-the-future/#comment-746</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Media and Communication in the Future Church</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithgrowth.com/?p=937#comment-746</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Media and Communication in the Future Church. Share this:FacebookStumbleUponEmailWritten by: Mick Bradley on September 8, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Media and Communication in the Future Church. Share this:FacebookStumbleUponEmailWritten by: Mick Bradley on September 8, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communication in the Church of the Future by Christopher Harris</title>
		<link>http://faithgrowth.com/2011/communication-in-the-church-of-the-future/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 01:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithgrowth.com/?p=937#comment-745</guid>
		<description>Beth- I believe you are right on.  The shift in communication will directly impact what our worship looks like.  I too agree that sermons will have to look dramatically different and I applaud your use of some type of dialogue in your sermons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beth- I believe you are right on.  The shift in communication will directly impact what our worship looks like.  I too agree that sermons will have to look dramatically different and I applaud your use of some type of dialogue in your sermons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Communication in the Church of the Future by Beth</title>
		<link>http://faithgrowth.com/2011/communication-in-the-church-of-the-future/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 01:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://faithgrowth.com/?p=937#comment-744</guid>
		<description>For starters, it speaks directly to the preaching moment that has traditionally been one to many.  I&#039;ve found that if the sermon doesn&#039;t have some form of dialogue in it (many to one, many to many), it&#039;s not meeting the cultural need for participation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For starters, it speaks directly to the preaching moment that has traditionally been one to many.  I&#8217;ve found that if the sermon doesn&#8217;t have some form of dialogue in it (many to one, many to many), it&#8217;s not meeting the cultural need for participation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bios by TribalChurch.org</title>
		<link>http://faithgrowth.com/bios/#comment-450</link>
		<dc:creator>TribalChurch.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 13:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://s285681997.onlinehome.us/#comment-450</guid>
		<description>[...] of the experience completely depends on who shows up (well… that and the mad logistic skills of Christopher Harris). Thanks to Ryan Kemp-Pappan and Brian Merritt’s interactive promotional genius and design, some [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the experience completely depends on who shows up (well… that and the mad logistic skills of Christopher Harris). Thanks to Ryan Kemp-Pappan and Brian Merritt’s interactive promotional genius and design, some [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

